A kahanist is a person that desires a theocracy imposed on Israel. A secularist who respects religion but has not been to services in a decade is a poor candidate to be a Kahanist. I have several posts where I expressly advocate a form of Civil law that respects religious terms like marriage. How those posts and my areligious personal life can be construed as Kahanist is a comedic classic?
Kahanists also disrespect the institutions of Western Democracy. Kahane has pointed out there is nothing Jewish in democracy.A perosn who wants to protect those institutions from Communist subversion is not a good candidate to be a Kahanist.
I am also quite open about my desire for Gay people to be left alone and civil unions. These are hardly the positions a Kahanist would take.
Kahanists tend to govern their politics by religious law. For example I view Communists who happen to be Jewish as dangerous death cultist. Kahanists follow the talmudic law when common sense dictates these people are natural traitors.
The reality is that old texts, be they the Koran, Talmud or Manifesto are not the basis to run a productive society. Religious law is meant for our personal lives and hinders economic productivity. The manifesto like all commie creations is best placed in landfills along with their authors.
Kahanists are exagerated by Commie Vermin who see them a Jewish Counter Part to Hamas. This is a hysterical exageration on the part of commies. One has to do a genuine search to find Kahane inspired violence. Barch Goldstei was how many years ago? One can readilly find hundreds of Muslim terror attacks in that time.
I have been approached by these types for two decades. I am not into silly Utopian dreams in their case. However, they are far less dangerous than your kind. I place the notion of creating a Jewish theocracy right up there with the hemp crowd.
Ducky Kindy explain what views expressed on this blog qualify me as a Kahanist?